By Annette Hickey | 12 March 2019

Surrogacy And The Irish Mother (Part Two)

phkl-irish-mother-part-2Following part one of this blog which looked at Surrogacy and what it can mean for an Irish Mother, we thought it necessary to look a bit more closely at specific areas of the “General Scheme of the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill 2017” to see what it actually means in reality.

The Legal Definition Of A Mother In Ireland

To begin, we believe it is important to look at the legal definition of who a mother actually is in Ireland.

Irish law currently defines the mother as the woman who gives birth. This is based on the maxim "Mater Semper Certa Est", i.e. motherhood is always certain.

Historically, motherhood was always certain, the woman who gave birth was always the mother. This is, however, no longer the case as the scientific development of assisted human reproduction technologies means that this historic legal definition of motherhood needs to be updated to reflect the current reality of motherhood in the 21st century. 

Motherhood is not certain anymore as medical procedures and assisted human reproduction has developed considerably over the years since the birth of the first IVF baby in Manchester in 1978. The first Irish baby born through IVF was born in 1986, eight years behind the first ever IVF baby. In contrast, the first surrogacy legislation in the UK was enacted in 1985. In Ireland, 34 years later, surrogacy remains unregulated and we continue to wait for surrogacy legislation to be enacted. 

New call-to-action

There is no definitive definition of motherhood in the Irish constitution. There is nothing in the Irish constitution that restricts legislation which recognises the Irish woman as the mother under a surrogacy arrangement. In our opinion, it is essential, in a modern, compassionate 21st century Ireland, that surrogacy legislation that reflects the reality of assisted human reproduction technologies and motherhood is enacted. 

The General Scheme of the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill 2017 Part 6 (Surrogacy) ("AHR Bill") 

Key ‘Heads’ in the AHR Bill include:

  • Head 44 of the AHR Bill states "that the surrogate will be the legal mother of any child born as a result of the surrogacy agreement". When we outline some of the heads of the AHR Bill to Irish couples, this is the head that results in a sharp intake of breath, the look of hurt and pain, sometimes tears and the questions "Why?". Why can that be? Why hasn't that changed? 
  • Head 37 does not give a right of appeal to the intended parents in the event that the surrogacy agreement does not receive pre-authorisation approval from the Regulatory Authority. The right of appeal is with the assisted human reproduction treatment provider. Surely the intended parents should be told why their surrogacy agreement did not receive pre-authorisation approval and the right of appeal should be with the intended parents? 
  • Head 41 states that surrogacy agreements are not enforceable by the intended parents, except for their obligation to pay the reasonable expenses of the surrogate. This head also provides that the surrogate has the right to manage her pregnancy as any other pregnant woman. 
  • Head 46 provides that whilst the surrogate is still viewed as the legal mother of the child, the child, after birth, must live with the intended parents. 
  • Head 47 provides that an application for a parental order, (transferring parental rights to the intended parents and extinguishing the legal relationship of the surrogate with the child) can only be brought between six weeks and six months after the birth of the child. 
  • Head 48 provides that the Court will grant a parental order if it is satisfied that all its criteria are met, including the surrogate's consent. It also provides that the surrogate may withdraw her consent at any stage prior to the parental order being granted. 

Whilst we welcome the AHR Bill and acknowledge that it does provide for the Irish mother to be an intended parent in the application for a parental order, it does not address the fact that the surrogate continues to be described as the legal mother.

We have completed a number of very detailed reviews of Part 6 Surrogacy of the AHR Bill, including a general comprehensive review, a review focusing on the rights and welfare of the child and a review focusing on the issues and concerns for legal advisors who will provide the legal advice at various stages as provided for in the AHR Bill. 

We firmly believe that if the public were made aware of and understood the full extent of the long and difficult journeys that women have endured before they come to us seeking advice on surrogacy, the medical tests, the treatments, the pain and the suffering, that Irish people would want to acknowledge the Irish woman and give her the same respect and dignity as the Irish father. 

We also believe that the granting of pre-birth Parental Orders with all parties having the benefit of independent legal advice and counselling should be included in the AHR Bill by the Irish legislature. 

The AHR Bill is very similar to the UK surrogacy legislation, however, during last summer the Law Commission of England and Wales and the Scottish Law Commission started working on a review of the laws around surrogacy after government funding was agreed. The Law Commissioner for England and Wales, Professor Nick Hopkins, said "Our society has moved on from when surrogacy laws were first introduced 30 years ago and now they are not fit for purpose". "We want all those with an interest to get involved and help us make the law fit for the modern world". 

Shouldn't we be learning from the experiences of our nearest neighbours and strive to ensure that our surrogacy laws are "fit for purpose”, are "fit for the modern world” and not based on legislation which is over 30 years old and publicly acknowledged by those closest to it as being out of date and not fit for purpose?

Mother's Day is the 31st of this month. This day is yet another day of heartache, grief and sadness for so many women in Ireland. It is my sincere hope that the legislature shows respect, compassion and empathy to all of these women. It is also my most sincere hope that we, as a society, focus on this most important issue, open our eyes to the reality of infertility for so many women and be more sensitive, supportive and understanding. 

New Call-to-action

Written By Annette Hickey

Annette has exclusively practised family law in the litigation department for the past 10 years and heads up the firm's Surrogacy & Fertility law team.

She is highly respected and regarded for her expertise and knowledge of fertility law, surrogacy and same-sex family matters. Diligent, thorough and empathetic, Annette bring a wealth of experience, sensitivity and understanding to our team.

New Call-to-action

Get In Touch